EAJA Awards
| Agency | Agency subcomponent | Name | Award date | Award amount | Awardees | Claims description | Finding basis | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) | Avalos-Suarez v. Barr |
$ 13,000
|
REDACTED | Petitioner claimed the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) incorrectly concluded there was a lack of clarity in the law in 1993 in relation to the admissibility date of Special Agricultural Worker permanent residents. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed with Petitioner that the BIA committed legal error in determining the law was unclear when deciding whether to reopen Petitioner's 1993 deportation proceeding. | Settlement Agreement | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) | Calmo-Carrillo v. Barr |
$ 2,000
|
REDACTED | Petitioner claimed the Board of Immigration Appeals made a factual determination with regard to asylum defense in removal proceeding in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(iv). Petitioner appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Government moved for a voluntary remand. | Settlement Agreement | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Nielsen |
$ 10,980
|
REDACTED | Habeas petition/motion for preliminary injunction to reinstate immigration bond. | Order simply states that the government's position was not substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Nielsen | Null | REDACTED | Habeas petition/preliminary injunction motion. | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Barr |
$ 8,940
|
REDACTED | Habeas petition | Prolonged detention of alien in mandatory detention. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Moore | Null | REDACTED | Writ of mandamus | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Whitaker | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Whitaker |
$ 27,764
|
REDACTED | Petition for review | The Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion by failing to find that the alien was prejudiced by his prior counsel’s ineffectiveness, and by failing to provide a reasoned decision addressing his request to reopen sua sponte because he was eligible for adjustment of status based on the discharge of a prior New York state conviction. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Sessions | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Sessions | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Barr | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Barr |
$ 26,956
|
REDACTED | Petition for review | Based on remand to reconsider visa certification and claims for relief. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Barr | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Sessions | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | REDACTED v. Whitaker | Null | REDACTED | Petition for review | Null | Show |