EAJA Awards
Agency | Agency subcomponent | Name | Award date | Award amount | Awardees | Claims description | Finding basis | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Zack v. Wilkie |
$ 6,127
|
STOLZ, ZACHARY M | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Zachary v. Wilkie |
$ 4,965
|
LUCK, ADAM R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Zacha v. Wilkie |
$ 3,995
|
CENTONZIO, JAVIER A | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Zacek v. Wilkie |
$ 5,558
|
VITERNA, MICHAEL R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Zabloski v. Wilkie |
$ 5,940
|
STOLZ, ZACHARY M | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Zaber v. Wilkie |
$ 5,165
|
BERGMANN, GLENN R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) | Zabaleta v. Nielsen, et al |
$ 20,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to adoption of new SIJ Policy resulting in denial of plaintiff's SIJ applications. | The Court granted plaintiff's MSJ rendering plaintiff a prevailing party. EAJA claim was settled and split between three payees. | Show | |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) | Zabaleta v. Nielsen, et al |
$ 25,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to adoption of new SIJ Policy resulting in denial of plaintiff's SIJ applications. | The Court granted plaintiff's MSJ rendering plaintiff a prevailing party. EAJA claim was settled and split between three payees. | Show | |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) | Zabaleta v. Nielsen, et al |
$ 15,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to adoption of new SIJ Policy resulting in denial of plaintiff's SIJ applications. | The Court granted plaintiff's MSJ rendering plaintiff a prevailing party. EAJA claim was settled and split between three payees. | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Yusko v. Wilkie |
$ 6,044
|
STOLZ, ZACHARY M | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Yuman v. Wilkie |
$ 10,260
|
TROMBLE, STACY A | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Yuill v. Wilkie |
$ 5,846
|
BINDER, BENJAMIN R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Ysasaga, Jr v. Wilkie |
$ 8,841
|
ODOM, AMY F | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Ysaguirre v. Wilkie |
$ 6,894
|
HOFFMAN, ROSALEE | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Youngpeter v. Wilkie |
$ 5,701
|
BERGMANN, GLENN R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show |