EAJA Awards

In order to download please refine your results

Filters

Clear

Filters

Apply

Agency	Agency subcomponent	Name	Award date	Award amount	Awardees	Claims description	Finding basis	Actions
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Kirwa, et al., v. DOD	12-21-2022	$ 500,000	REDACTED	Challenge to delays in processing N-400 applications under the MAVNI program	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Kabura v. McNeer	10-05-2020	$ 7,751	REDACTED	Alleged erroneous denial of naturalization.	Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified.	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Funez-Munguia v. Garland	07-28-2022	$ 7,000	REDACTED	Challenge to the BIA denial of appeal from an Immigration Judge’s decision denying an application for asylum and withholding of removal.	Plaintiff is a prevailing party in this litigation; the government’s position was not substantially justified; and the fees requested are reasonable.	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Udo v. Garland	01-09-2023	$ 35,000	REDACTED	Challenge to denial of asylum application and request for protection under the Convention Against Torture and a finding of filing a frivilous asylum application which had been based on adverse credibility findings and mistatements in the record	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Valdivia, et al v. Barr, et al	10-05-2020	$ 45,971	REDACTED	APA claim alleging improper denial of I-130.	Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified.	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	TAKWI v. GARLAND	08-18-2022	$ 27,000	REDACTED	Challenge to denial of asylum application which had been based on an adverse credibility finding	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Edakunni v. Mayorkas	01-19-2023	$ 150,000	REDACTED	Challenge to backlog in processing EAD’s for the H-4 (c26) and L-2 (a18) spousal visa categories, related to biometrics requirements and delays in scheduling in person biometrics appointments due to COVID19.	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, et al v. USCIS, et al	10-07-2020	$ 500,000	REDACTED	Class action challenging the delays of EAD applications based on initial asylum applications that have been pending longer than the 30 day regulatory period.	Settlement was reached.	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Arguijo v. USCIS	09-12-2022	$ 146,111	REDACTED	Challenge to the denial of a visa petition.	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Pyanzin v. Garland	01-12-2023	$ 2,800	REDACTED	Challenges to the denial of asylum, withholding of removal and protection under CAT, and the denial of a motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel by the BIA.	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Guerra Rocha, et al v. Barr	10-08-2020	$ 15,000	REDACTED	PFR challenge of a BIA decision that involved alledged improper placement of U visa applicant in removal proceedings.	Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified.	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Clemente Garcia v. CBP	01-15-2023	$ 5,000	REDACTED	Challenge to denial of a family based visa petition	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Stellar IT Solutions, Inc, et al v. USCIS	10-28-2020	$ 13,000	REDACTED	APA suit challenging the denial of an H1B petition.	Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified.	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Pitman and Damaschin v. USCIS	03-24-2023	$ 36,120	REDACTED	Challenge to denial of a family based visa petition	Settlement-stipulation of the parties	Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security	USCIS	Mendez Rojas v. Johnson	11-05-2020	$ 138,019	REDACTED	Class action challenging government’s alleged lack of adequate notice to asylum seekers regarding the statutory one year deadline to file an asylum application after entering the United States, and alleging that the government failed to provide a mechanism for certain class members to timely file for asylum.	Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified.	Show

Delete

Do you really want to delete this item?

There is no undo for this operation.

Cancel Delete

Viewing 15 of 73710 results