EAJA Awards
| Agency | Agency subcomponent | Name | Award date | Award amount | Awardees | Claims description | Finding basis | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Zerezghi v. USCIS |
$ 84,000
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of an I-130 family visa petition. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | India House v. McAleenan |
$ 40,000
|
REDACTED | APA challenge to the denial of an H-1 B visa. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Berardo v. USCIS |
$ 45,073
|
REDACTED | APA challenge to the denial of an I-140 Petition for Alien Worker. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Hehar v. Barr |
$ 16,250
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Sodhi Singh v. Barr |
$ 49,000
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Balbuena Cruz v. Wilkinson |
$ 4,475
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Wenying Sun v. William Barr |
$ 9,000
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Zifeng Liu v. Barr |
$ 14,500
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Pulatov v. USCIS |
$ 13,370
|
REDACTED | 1447(b) litigation regarding delayed naturalization. USCIS settled the claim. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Addo v. Garland |
$ 11,000
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Sathanthrasa v. Barr |
$ 12,972
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Guzman-Lopez, et al v. Garland |
$ 10,000
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Qubadi v. Hackbarth |
$ 100,000
|
REDACTED | challenge to denial of adjustment of status, application I-485. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | L.M.-M v. Cuccinell |
$ 53,012
|
REDACTED | Challenge to USCIS policy memo which changed Asylum Division policy on scheduling credible fear interviews (reduced the time to consult, changed the reschedule policy, and stopped in-person orientations). | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Abdullahi v. Garland |
$ 11,075
|
REDACTED | PFR challenge to denial of asylum and witholding of removal. | Plaintiff was the prevailing party whose position was substantially justified. | Show |