EAJA Awards

Agency Agency subcomponent Name Award date Award amount Awardees Claims description Finding basis Actions
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Zack v. Wilkie
$ 6,127
STOLZ, ZACHARY M Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Zachary v. Wilkie
$ 4,965
LUCK, ADAM R Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Zacha v. Wilkie
$ 3,995
CENTONZIO, JAVIER A Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Zacek v. Wilkie
$ 5,558
VITERNA, MICHAEL R Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Zabloski v. Wilkie
$ 5,940
STOLZ, ZACHARY M Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Zaber v. Wilkie
$ 5,165
BERGMANN, GLENN R Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Zabaleta v. Nielsen, et al
$ 20,000
REDACTED Challenge to adoption of new SIJ Policy resulting in denial of plaintiff's SIJ applications. The Court granted plaintiff's MSJ rendering plaintiff a prevailing party. EAJA claim was settled and split between three payees. Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Zabaleta v. Nielsen, et al
$ 25,000
REDACTED Challenge to adoption of new SIJ Policy resulting in denial of plaintiff's SIJ applications. The Court granted plaintiff's MSJ rendering plaintiff a prevailing party. EAJA claim was settled and split between three payees. Show
U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Zabaleta v. Nielsen, et al
$ 15,000
REDACTED Challenge to adoption of new SIJ Policy resulting in denial of plaintiff's SIJ applications. The Court granted plaintiff's MSJ rendering plaintiff a prevailing party. EAJA claim was settled and split between three payees. Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Yusko v. Wilkie
$ 6,044
STOLZ, ZACHARY M Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Yuman v. Wilkie
$ 10,260
TROMBLE, STACY A Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Yuill v. Wilkie
$ 5,846
BINDER, BENJAMIN R Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Ysasaga, Jr v. Wilkie
$ 8,841
ODOM, AMY F Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Ysaguirre v. Wilkie
$ 6,894
HOFFMAN, ROSALEE Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Null Youngpeter v. Wilkie
$ 5,701
BERGMANN, GLENN R Benefits under Title 38 BVA committed a remandable or reversable error Show