EAJA Awards
| Agency | Agency subcomponent | Name | Award date | Award amount | Awardees | Claims description | Finding basis | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Saget v. Biden |
$ 50,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to the termination of designation of Temporary Protected Status for certain Haitians | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Kakar v. USCIS |
$ 24,000
|
REDACTED | Whether USCIS adequately explained the bases for denial of adjustment of status and fully considered the evidence before it. | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Saget v. Biden |
$ 150,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to the termination of designation of Temporary Protected Status for certain Haitians | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Arguijo v. USCIS |
$ 146,111
|
REDACTED | Challenge to the denial of a visa petition. | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Saget v. Biden |
$ 100,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to the termination of designation of Temporary Protected Status for certain Haitians | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | TAKWI v. GARLAND |
$ 27,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to denial of asylum application which had been based on an adverse credibility finding | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Rodas Bolanos v. Garland |
$ 13,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to the BIA denial of appeal from an Immigration Judge’s decision denying an application for asylum and withholding of removal. | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Salazar-Velasquez v. Garland |
$ 14,500
|
REDACTED | Challenges to the denial of asylum, withholding of removal and protection under CAT by the BIA. | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | De La Luz Ramos v. Garland |
$ 16,866
|
REDACTED | Challenge to the denial of claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Gomez Rosario v. USCIS |
$ 7,500
|
REDACTED | Challenge to a denial of visa classification under the APA | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Kakar v. USCIS |
$ 24,000
|
REDACTED | Whether USCIS adequately explained the bases for denial of adjustment of status and fully considered the evidence before it. | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Gupta v. Garland |
$ 1,500
|
REDACTED | Challenge to delay in deciding N-400 naturalization application past 120 days after initial examination | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Adam v. USCIS |
$ 16,206
|
REDACTED | Challenge to delayed decision in naturalization case under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Reyes Pujols v. Garland |
$ 25,000
|
REDACTED | Challenge to denial of asylum application which had been based on an adverse credibility finding | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | USCIS | Adam v. USCIS |
$ 21,794
|
REDACTED | Challenge to delayed decision in naturalization case under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) | Settlement-stipulation of the parties | Show |