EAJA Awards
| Agency | Agency subcomponent | Name | Award date | Award amount | Awardees | Claims description | Finding basis | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Agriculture | Farm Service Agency (FSA) | Lenz Farms GP | Null |
$ 17,599
|
Lenz Farms GP | NAD | NAD Decision - Title 5 U.S.C. Section 504; 7 CFR Section 1.180 et seq | Show |
| U.S. Postal Service | N/A | Jones v. USPS | Null |
$ 79,900
|
Mondaire Jones, et al. | Constitutional challenge alleging that purported operational changes would impact timely processing and delivery of Election Mail | Settlement Agreement - The parties settled upon mutually agreed terms, no admission of liability for fees or litigation expenses, no admission of wrongdoing or liability | Show |
| U.S. Department of Education | Null | Council of Parent, Attorney, and Advocates, Inc. v. ED et al | Null |
$ 115,000
|
Plaintiff's Counsel | EAJA claim for attorneys' fees and costs related to litigation challenging a Department final rule delaying implementation of IDEA significant disproportionality regulations. Plaintiff, Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, claimed 1470 hours and $20,000 in costs. | Settlement (preliminary agreement subject to final approval) | Show |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Berube v. Wilkie | Null |
$ 3,813
|
SULLIVAN, THOMAS E | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | DHS/TSA | Ibrahim v. DHS |
$ 220,029
|
REDACTED | Challenge to non-citizen’s placement on No Fly watch list and rescission of her student visa. | Court found the watch list placement was erroneous and that the government’s attempt to defend the error was neither reasonable nor substantially justified. Parties litigated the extent of fees until 2-Jan-2019 en banc ruling by Ninth Circuit sufficiently narrowed the points of contention to permit resolving the amount of the fees owed by settlement. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security | Transportation Security Administration (TSA) | Ibrahim v. DHS |
$ 220,029
|
REDACTED | Challenge to non-citizen’s placement on No Fly watch list and rescission of her student visa. | Court found the watch list placement was erroneous and that the government’s attempt to defend the error was neither reasonable nor substantially justified. Parties litigated the extent of fees until 2-Jan-2019 en banc ruling by Ninth Circuit sufficiently narrowed the points of contention to permit resolving the amount of the fees owed by settlement. | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 7,500
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 4,304
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 4,433
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 5,442
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 3,015
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 1,862
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 6,000
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 4,100
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show | |
| Other Agency | Social Security Administration (SSA) | [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security |
$ 3,000
|
[Redacted] | Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act | [Redacted] | Show |