EAJA Awards

Agency Agency subcomponent Name Award date Award amount Awardees Claims description Finding basis Actions
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Null LaDonna Reed-Morton v. Fudge
$ 10,000
Null Plaintiff alleged that she was subjected to a lowered annual rating and a suspension in retaliation for a previous EEOC case she brought against a former supervisor. Settlement agreement Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) In the matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 27,249
Null Wetlands determination Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) In the matter of Natural Resources Conservation Service
$ 9,400
Null Environmental Quality Incentives Program Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) In the matter of Natural Resources Conservation Service
$ 11,213
Null Environmental Quality Incentives Program Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) In the matter of Natural Resources Conservation Service
$ 65,865
Null Wetlands determination Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) In the matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 55,883
Null Prevented planting credits Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) In the matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 20,325
Null Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency (RMA) In the matter of Risk Management Agency
$ 40,581
Null Whole Farm Revenue Protection Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) In the matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 9,485
Null Conservation Reserve Program Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) In the matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 3,800
Null Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program Award Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development In the Matter of Rural Development
$ 5,338
Null Challenge to Multi-Family Housing decision. The Applicant has met its burden of demonstrating that it meets all the conditions of eligibility for an award of EAJA fees and expenses. The Agency’s actions and decision were not substantially justified. The Applicant was the prevailing party in the adversarial adjudication. The Applicant has not unduly or unreasonably delayed or protracted the proceedings.There are no special circumstances that would make the award of fees unjust. The Applicant’s request for attorney fees and accountant fees is approved, as modified. Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency In the Matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 48,913
Null Challenge to Market Facilitation Program payments Applicants’ application meets EAJA requirements. Applicants prevailed over the Department. The Department’s position in the underlying NAD appeal was not substantially justified. The claimed fees and expenses are authorized under the law. Show
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency In the Matter of Farm Service Agency
$ 178,850
Null Challenge to Wetland determination Applicants’ application meets EAJA requirements. Applicants prevailed over the Department. The Department’s position in the underlying NAD appeal was not substantially justified. Applicant has not unduly or unreasonably delayed or protracted the proceedings.There are no special circumstances that would make the award of fees unjust. Show
Other Agency Social Security Administration (SSA) [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security
$ 4,700
[Redacted] Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act [Redacted] Show
Other Agency Social Security Administration (SSA) [Redacted] v Commissioner of Social Security
$ 3,700
[Redacted] Action for Judicial Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Social Security Act [Redacted] Show