EAJA Awards
| Agency | Agency subcomponent | Name | Award date | Award amount | Awardees | Claims description | Finding basis | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | OGC Public Health Division | Tice-Harouff, Cami Jo; 22CV00201 | Null | Cami Jo Tice-Harouff | Plaintiff, Cami Jo Tice-Harouff, a family nurse practitioner who instructs patients in fertility awareness-based methods of family planning (FABM), brought suit contending that the Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA’s) removal of a sentence referring to FABM from the 2021 HRSA-supported Women’s Preventive Services Guidelines violated the Administrative Procedure Act because it was done without notice and comment and because it was arbitrary and capricious. | Defendant’s position that the 2021 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-supported Women’s Preventive Services Guidelines did not remove coverage for counseling on fertility awareness-based methods of family planning (FABM), because education and counseling are included in the contraceptive care required to be covered as part of the contraception guideline, was not substantially justified. | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Adkisson v. Wilkie |
$ 1,618
|
Yancey, Constance D | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Agee v. Wilkie |
$ 8,607
|
SNIPES, EVAN T | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Alcorn, Jr v. Wilkie |
$ 3,148
|
CURRY, DANIEL G | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Allen v. Wilkie |
$ 7,041
|
DONEGAN, JUDY J | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Amend v. Wilkie |
$ 4,512
|
BERGMANN, GLENN R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Anania Jr v. Wilkie |
$ 5,332
|
RAVIN, SEAN A | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Anson v. Wilkie |
$ 5,493
|
STOLZ, ZACHARY M | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Arnwine v. Wilkie |
$ 9,854
|
STOLZ, ZACHARY M | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Arseneau v. Wilkie |
$ 4,568
|
BERGMANN, GLENN R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Ashton v. Wilkie |
$ 4,823
|
BERGMANN, GLENN R | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Avant v. Wilkie |
$ 3,331
|
WESCHE, TODD M | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Babbini v. Wilkie |
$ 3,276
|
FAUSONE, JAMES G | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Baker v. Wilkie |
$ 6,574
|
TROMBLE, STACY A | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show | |
| U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs | Null | Belcher v. Wilkie |
$ 5,135
|
MARQUET, L MICHAEL | Benefits under Title 38 | BVA committed a remandable or reversable error | Show |